Skip to main content

i [don't know] Pad

With the initial rumours of Apple contending against the Tablet market, and then the possible name, I did not feel much excitement as there were questions as to what innovations can take place in the market.

Then the iPad was launched and it received a luke-warm reception, echoing Microsoft's ailment of Windows Vista.

After looking at the reviews and in-depth reports I still remain unconvinced of the usefulness of this latest offering. Here are a number of reasons as to why:

  1. It does not run the full Mac OS, but the phone OS. The limitation: multi-tasking and you are restricted to the App Store for applications
  2. The lack of storage. The iPad comes in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB, which begs the question of future expansion. At the very moment I am using a Tablet PC with 64GB storage and am already struggling to store all my pictures and music.
  3. Lack of expansion. That's right, there's no USB ports, no Flash card support and no built-in webcam. There goes video conferencing.
  4. Accessorised. Apple still likes to continue with forcing us to use proprietary ways of doing things like getting apps from the App Store. There's also only one connection that iPhone and iPod users will recognise, where you can plug in a keyboard. And the good old fashioned "I can't replace the battery".
The tip of the iceberg is that there is no keyboard attached, albeit you can get the add on and plug it in. This just defeats the objective as relying on the on-screen keyboard is very annoying. Remember those Tablets with the screen that turns around, how cool were they!?!

With all these limitations, it just seems to be an oversized iPhone without the facility of making a phone. Oh, and that gives another moan of network limitations to use 3G.

Indeed, the iPad looks very nice as Apple constantly amazes us with attractive gadgets. I just don't see how can Apple justify the high cost of owning one of these gadgets. Nor can I see a real practical use.

So, in the end, I'll give it a wide berth.


Popular posts from this blog

Open Source alternatives to Adobe Creative Suite

With the take over of Macromedia by Adobe, they have increased their arsenal of design packages, as well as the price. No-one can do pretty much without the popular package of Photoshop for their images, and Dreamweaver for websites, especially aspiring design students who do not have much money.

Nevertheless, open source software has come to save the day. What is open source software? In a nutshell it is free software with its source-code freely available to those who would like to expand or improve on the software. To expand further, anyone who’s tinkered with the source code such as optimisation or additional functionality can resubmit it back to the holders and let others enjoy the fruits of your labour.

I have trawled through the World Wide Web to find out how everyone can benefit from Open Source to build up their own studio and compete against Adobe Creative Suite. All this for free, apart from the cost of the Internet. I am planning to have a facility where you can purchase th…

Open Source alternatives to Adobe Creative Suite update

Oh yes, an update to an earlier post about getting hold of free or Open Source alternatives to Adobe Creative Suite.

I actually forgot to mention about Adobe ImageReady, which gets bundled with Photoshop. There are a number of basic animation tools, but none provide flexibility similar to ImageReady. Fortunately, Open Source lovers are in for a surprise in the form of GIMP Animation Package. This link will take you to the Windows download site as I cannot find any references to this for the Mac OS. Chances are that it could be part of the download, but I haven't had time to inspect this.

The Creative Suite package includes Adobe Bridge, which is a thumbnail viewer to convert images and open them up in any Adobe application for editing. No matter how they would try to trump up its name, it is still a thumbnail viewer. The best free application out there for this is IrfanView. Need I say more?

Are there any pixel pushers out there, who prefer to simply draw their own pics? Why…

ASP Reverse For Loop

It's kind of interesting of how reverse linking does not seem so obvious in classic ASP.  You would think that it would be along the lines of:

dim i
for i = 30 to 2
  'code comes here

but it's not.  To have a reverse For loop it's:

dim i
for i = 30 to 2 Step-1
  'code comes here

That's right that small bit (Step-1) makes all the difference.  I stumbled upon this by chance and thought that someone would benefit from this.

Happy coding.Blogged with Flock